Enterprises have hardly used any of the Training 4.0 subsidies. Why?

Enterprises have hardly used any of the Training 4.0 subsidies. But why haven’t they?

Is Training 4.0 useless? Have personnel already received sufficient training? Has the subsidy come at a difficult moment in history? Or is it simply a poorly organized programme?

Let’s take a step back. The Incentive consists in a tax credit (with rates of between 30% and 60% depending on the size of the enterprise) for the expenses incurred for the training of employees on technology subjects which are relevant to digital and technological transformation. Therefore the scheme is perfectly timed as it concerns the Industry 4.0, a topic that has been talked about for years and in which enterprises have invested (and this is a confirmed fact), acquiring new technologies at both a hardware and software level.

So what went wrong as far as the Training 4.0 is concerned (also subsidised)?

I have tried to give an answer to this question, but it is only my opinion and therefore I would like to receive yours in return.

Behind the lack of investment in Training 4.0 I think there are substantially two reasons.
The first – which I spoke about not long ago – is that basically

in Italia there is a lack of culture regarding the promotion of growth of resources.

In other words, many businessmen are sufficiently motivated as regards to investing in machinery, equipment and even properties, but are unfortunately convinced that those with the most performing machines will outshine the competition. In my opinion, however, the real difference is made by the technicians, designers and all those different professional profiles, different for each area, that rotate around businesses sector by sector, who know how to make them perform and achieve the desired results.

The second reason is – as far as I understand it –

many enterprises that have implemented software updates related to 4.0, only did so as they were mandatory in order to be able to take advantage of the Hyper depreciation scheme (an incentive much higher than that proposed by the Super depreciation scheme).

Therefore, to renew the fleet of machinery with a highly subsidised investment. Clearly not all, but several colleagues from other companies have admitted that – at least for the moment – they have no interest in conducting the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, a context in which having certain skills and abilities (for which continuous training and updating are currently indispensable) is a conditio sine qua non.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articoli recenti

Machine Tools: Invest in Speed or Stability? The Right Choice for Gear Manufacturing

If a machine tool is extremely fast but lacks stability, it may turn out to be the wrong investment. Here’s what our experience has taught us.

Gear Manufacturing and 3D Printing: Where Do We Stand?

A few years ago, we purchased a 3D printer. The investment paid for itself in just a couple of months and now saves us more than €10,000 every year. This is possible because we are fortunate to have an engineering department that does much more than design components—it studies, invents, and develops solutions that often do not yet exist on the market.

Production Data Collection and Analysis: How Is It Really Going?

Every day we hear about new solutions for production data collection and analysis, cycle optimization, energy savings, predictive maintenance, smart manufacturing, and much more. What would be even more interesting, however, is understanding how companies that have already invested in Industry 4.0—like us—are experiencing this phase in their day-to-day operations, now that the time has come to make the most of those investments.